Thanks for the replies, Allan, and Papa K&P. Of course I recall those incidents. My concern is not with the messenger, but with diluting the message. Here is the thing — there are plenty of real recent events to criticize Trump over: gutting the ACA, threatening NBC’s license, torpedoing the Iran nuke deal, Puerto Rico etc. as far as I know he hasn’t yet made lewd remarks about the boy/girl scouts — though the day is young. So, why attack him on a contrived scenario? This plays into his hands, by:

  • diverting attention from real sh#t going down
  • allowing Trumpsters to claim that libs are making up allegations & willing to use exploitative imagery to make their point

ps: yes on a personal note I was offended & disappointed that you didn’t bring the usual high level of satire (compared to recent brilliant posts on Weinstein’s bestiality and the ‘Juan by Juan’ Mexican deportation jokes), but that is secondary to above points, it is a matter of personal taste and not any grounds for blocking/scrubbing/purging the offensive content

Written by

Editor of No Crime in Rhymin' and Language Lab | the Woke Bloke ..."come for the sarcasm, stay for my soft side"

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store